首页> 外文OA文献 >Should Indonesia Accede to the 1951 Refugee Convention and Its 1967 Protocol?
【2h】

Should Indonesia Accede to the 1951 Refugee Convention and Its 1967 Protocol?

机译:印度尼西亚是否应该加入1951年《难民公约》及其1967年《议定书》?

摘要

Being a non-party to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (“1951 Refugee Convention”) and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (“1967 Protocol”), Indonesia does not have legal obligations to provide permanent resettlement for asylum seeker and/or refugee. However, as a transit country for those seeking shelter in Australia, Indonesia undergoes a myriad of issues resulting from illegal entrance by asylum seeker and/or refugee. Besides having neither legal framework nor domestic mechanism to handle asylum seekers and/or refugee, Indonesia\u27s immigration law identifies every foreigner including asylum seeker and refugee who unlawfully enter Indonesia\u27s territory into the same box as illegal migrant. It then leads to the arrest of asylum seeker and/or refugee to be put in an over-capacity detention center or other places. This paper will analyze various issues related to asylum seeker and refugee in Indonesia and to weigh whether it is indispensable for Indonesia to accede to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol.
机译:作为1951年《关于难民地位的公约》(“ 1951年难民公约”)和1967年《关于难民地位的议定书》(“ 1967年议定书”)的非缔约国,印度尼西亚没有法律义务为庇护提供永久安置。寻求者和/或难民。但是,作为在澳大利亚寻求庇护者的过境国,印度尼西亚面临着因寻求庇护者和/或难民非法入境而引起的众多问题。印度尼西亚的移民法除了没有法律框架或国内机制来处理寻求庇护者和/或难民外,还查明了所有非法进入印度尼西亚领土的外国人,包括寻求庇护者和难民,这些非法入境者与非法移民同在一个盒子里。然后,这导致寻求庇护者和/或难民的逮捕被安置在人满为患的拘留中心或其他地方。本文将分析与印度尼西亚的寻求庇护者和难民有关的各种问题,并权衡印度尼西亚是否必须加入1951年《难民公约》及其1967年《议定书》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号